The History of Texas: Growing Political and Military
Power in Texas, 1832-1833
(Previous Section:
Texas Colonists Revolt:
1831-1832)
Mexican Government Begins to Fear
Power and Independent Nature of Texas
THE Texans early revolutionary movements
of 1831-1832 had thus far triumphed; but, in so doing, they had the aid
and countenance of one of the powerful factions which alternately sway
the destinies of Mexico, and drench her fields with blood.
Notwithstanding they were on the popular side, they had been unfortunate
in exhibiting to the statesmen of Mexico their power. It had been seen
that, unaided, they had swept their own department of the Mexican
soldiery, and defied the officers of the customs. It was a lesson not to
be forgotten.
The experience of the past few years had
satisfied the Texans that they should be separated from Coahuila (a
neighboring Mexican state). It will be remembered that, from 1727 to
1824, Texas was a separate province, and in nowise connected with
Coahuila, more than with any other political division of Mexico.* The
Constitutional Congress of the last-named year had temporarily united it
with Coahuila; providing, however, by the second article of the Acta
Constitutiva, that "so soon as Texas should be in a situation to
figure as a state by itself alone, it should give notice of the same to
the general Congress for its resolution."
*
"Under the plan of Iguala and the treaties of Cordova, it [Texas]
was entitled to one deputy in the cortes of the Mexican empire,
which it was provided should be called. When the Constitutional
Congress had determined to adopt the federal form of government, and
provided for the election of the convention, or congreso
constituyente, to form the constitution, Texas had continued in
the same isolated situation, and was allowed one representative,
whom it accordingly sent."— Thomas J. Chambers's Pamphlet, 1833.
The Texans had many just grounds of
complaint against their union with Coahuila. The latter had three
fourths of the representation in the state legislature; and its
population, being composed almost wholly of Mexicans, would naturally be
disposed to keep the former in subjection. Hence the administration of
justice in Texas was neglected; the right of trial by jury was
postponed; the laws were published in a language unknown to the
colonists; and many other abuses and ills they suffered, which, with a
state organization of their own, they might have remedied.
Texas Constitutional Convention, 1832
Having found themselves able to drive the
Mexican soldiery out of their territory, the Texans believed their
department was " in a situation to figure as a state," and took measures
to call a convention to adopt a constitution, and lay it before the
supreme Congress for its resolution. Accordingly, after a short notice,
the convention met at San Felipe, in October, 1832, and entered upon the
discussion of a separate state constitution. The work was one of
delicacy. Two things we to be attained; the instrument was to be so
framed as to pass the ordeal of the national Congress, and not come too
much in conflict with Mexican prejudices; and it must contain all those
elements of Anglo-Saxon liberty usual in such cases—such as trial by
jury, the habeas corpus, the absence of restraints upon the rights of
conscience, and opposition to a standing army. The shortness of the
notice given for the assembling of the convention, and the absence of a
number of the delegates, prevented a satisfactory conclusion of their
labors. Accordingly, after sitting a week, they adjourned. What they had
done, however, was important, inasmuch as the subject was brought before
the public mind; and the convention which, in the April following, met
for the same purpose, came together more fully instructed and prepared.
The civil war between
Santa
Anna and Bustamente continued to rage in Mexico; but after the death
of his favorite general Teran, Bustamente proposed terms of peace, which
were accepted by Santa Anna. It was agreed that Pedraza, the
legally-elected president of 1828, should be reinstated in his office,
and that both parties should unite in support of the constitution of
1824. The national Congress, however, refused to ratify this agreement.
The two generals, notwithstanding, enforced it, and, on the 26th of
December, 1832, placed Pedraza in the presidential chair. Having
accomplished this object, Santa Anna retired to await the reward which
he expected for his patriotic efforts in behalf of the constitution of
1824.
Thus, in the autumn of the year 1832,
Texans seem to have been at peace; and, at the close of that year, the
ship of state in Mexico appears to have got under way. But these were
treacherous signs of peace. Already were some engaged in forging the
chains of slavery, and others in storing up munitions of war.
On the 28th of April, 1832, the state
legislature made an entire change in the colonization law. They repealed
the general colonization law of 1825, known as Decree No. 16, and,
instead thereof, limited the empresas to Mexicans; modifying the terms
of sale to Mexican purchasers, extending the rights of colonists, and
excluding natives of the United States. Yet they showed some liberality
in recognizing existing contracts, and even in extending the time within
which some of the empresarios were to introduce the requisite number of
colonists. The legislature also, at the instance of the Texan
delegation, introduced the practice of creating municipalities, and
directing the election, by the people, of municipal officers. This was a
point gained—a continuance of that decentralizing process by which the
people were extracting power from the political chiefs. These municipal
corporate bodies, elected by the people, sympathized with them, and two
years afterward became nuclei around which they rallied and organized in
defense of their rights.
In the midst of all these scenes, Colonel
Austin was calm. His object was to consummate his great work. He desired
that his colony should live, and grow, and prosper. At the same time he
wished it to be free; and, although he foresaw, as did all men of
discernment, that a people of the elevated and independent character of
his colonists could not and would not long live in subjection to the
changing, antiquated system of government followed by Mexican statesmen,
yet, before the separation came, he wished to see his people in their
manhood —able to grapple with an enemy who would not easily surrender so
great a prize.
The statesmen of Mexico looked at these
scenes with very different eyes. They would gladly have cherished Texas,
and conferred upon her many favors; but they were afraid of her.
The Anglo-Saxon love of liberty—the lofty
bearing of the humblest of the colonists—their enterprise, intelligence,
and abhorrence of the bloody scenes of Mexico—and their general contempt
for the Mexican rulers—made them an object of dread to the supreme
government at the capitol. The active movements of the summer of 1832
began to attract the attention of the people of the United States, and
the love of adventure drew to the colonies many enterprising and daring
spirits. These, by the prominent stand they took in Texas, increased
this dread.
[Next Section of
Texas History:
Sam Houston Moves to
Texas: 1832] |