The History of Texas: 1825-1830
(Previous Section:
Hayden Edwards and the
Fredonian Revolution)
Colonel Green Dewitt's Texas Colony
WHILE the war was progressing in
Edwards's colony,
the pioneers in Austin's grant
were prospering greatly. Settlers also had been coming into other
colonies. Colonel Green Dewitt, of Missouri, commenced the settlement of
his colony in 1825. His surveyor, James Kerr, arrived on the Brazos in
April, 1825. After losing his own family, he, with six other single men,
settled with that of Mr. Berry, near the town of Gonzales, in the autumn
of the above year. Among these single men was
Erastus Smith, afterward
so distinguished as a spy in the
Texan wars.*
* Deaf Smith
Erastus Smith (known as Deaf Smith, because he was hard of hearing)
was the son of Chiliab and Mary Smith, and was horn in New York, on
the 19th of April, 1787. At the age of eleven years he emigrated
with his parents to the Mississippi territory, and settled near
Natchez. His parents were exemplary members of the Baptist church,
and gave him such moral and intellectual training as the
circumstances around them would permit. He first came to Texas in
1817, perhaps with some of the patriot forces that were constantly
arriving at that time in the province. He soon, however, returned
home; but, in 1821, he came again to Texas, for the purpose of
making it his home. This he did, never leaving it. He was in the
country before Austin, but in what section is not known. His nature
was to ramble alone, and to be by himself, when Dewitt's settlement
commenced at Gonzales, Smith went with the first company; but it
appears he did not remain there long, but proceeded to San Antonio,
where he married a Mexican lady, by whom he had several children. He
had a fine property at Grand Gulf, Mississippi, but he did not
attend to it. One of his sons, Trinidad Travis Smith, was educated
by K. A. Martin, Esq., of Baldwin, Mississippi. Deaf Smith died at
Fort Bend, November 30, 1837. He was a man of remarkable gravity and
few words. In fact, he seldom answered at all except in
monosyllables. When he did speak, it was said to be to the point.
His coolness in danger and battle was affirmed to be unsurpassed.
The Texan army was greatly favored in having his services as a spy.
His actions at the
Battle of San Jacinto- Destroying a bridge to eliminate
Santa Anna's escape route, was a brave and important act in this
pivotal battle. -The country had no truer friend. — Letter of
Alexander Calder, Esq., August 2, 1852; and Letter of K. A. Martin,
1840, MSS.
Colony Attacked by Indians
They raised some cabins and settled
themselves, preparatory to the work of surveying. The settlement was
increased that fall by the arrival of Edward Morehouse, Henry S. Brown,
Elijah Stapp, and some others. In 1826, while a portion of the colonists
had gone to join in celebrating the 4th of July at Beason's on the
Colorado, and others were out on a buffalo-hunt, an attack was made by
the
Indians. John Wightman was killed, Durbin wounded, and part of the
settlement robbed and burnt. The survivors fled to the settlements on
the Colorado; and afterward, when Dewitt came on, with other families,
he built a fort ten miles above Texana, where he remained a year or two.
Martin De Leon Colony
The settlement at Victoria, under Martin
De Leon, commenced also in 1825. After the
revocation of Edwards's grant, the territory embraced in it was
divided between David G. Burnett and Joseph Vehlin, and immigrants from
the United States continued to flow into it. Being the nearest colony to
the American Union, many settlers stopped there that had, at first,
intended to proceed farther.
First Texas Constitution and Government Organization
The congress of the state of Coahuila and
Texas at last agreed upon a constitution. It was published on the 11th
of March, 1827. Every officer and citizen was required to take an oath
to sustain it, and a program of the ceremony of its installation was
duly prepared.
Of the twelve deputies of which the
constitutional congress was to be composed, Texas was to have two. These
representatives were not to be elected directly by the people; but on
the first Sunday in August preceding the meeting of the new congress,
the people met in primitive assemblies, and voted viva voce, or
in writing, for eleven electors (if they had only one representative to
elect, or twenty-one electors if they had two). The election closed on
Monday evening.
Fifteen days after the fourth Sunday in
August, these electors met at the towns of their respective districts,
and elected their representatives. The same electors who met to choose
representatives, voted for electors to repair to the capital of the
state, to elect representatives to the general Congress. The same
district electors voted for a governor, vice-governor, and council.
The ayuntamientos, embracing the
alcaldes, sindicos, and regidores, were elected by
the people, on the first Sunday in every December, and entered on the
discharge of their duties the Sunday following. The alcalde
combined the duties of our mayors and justices of the peace, with larger
powers; the regidore may be assimilated to an alderman, and the
sindico to a recorder. The whole together formed the
ayuntamiento, having jurisdiction over the entire municipality.
Every town of a thousand or more inhabitants was entitled to an
ayuntamiento. These town councils were strictly popular bodies, and
with their great power protected Texas from oppression until the troops
were introduced.
In looking over the constitution of the
state of Coahuila and Texas, we see at once that it was framed by
novices—men who were not only ignorant of the fundamental laws of free
states, but were afraid to entrust power to the people. For instance;
"Article 3. The sovereignty of the state resides originally and
essentially in the general mass of the individuals that compose it; but
they shall not, of themselves, exercise any other acts of sovereignty
than those pointed out in this constitution, and in the form which it
prescribes." Again; "Article 27. The government of the state is popular
representative, federal." The makers of the instrument, no doubt, did
the best they could, and were actuated by genuine patriotism. Whatever
puerilities may be found in the constitution, and in the laws enacted
under it, the people of Texas were indifferent and heeded them not, so
long as they were left to themselves, and did not feel the weight of
strange systems and unmeaning ceremonies. And it is due to the truth of
history to declare that the Texans did not feel themselves at home under
the Mexican laws. They kept aloof from Mexican politics. They brought
with them here, as household gods, their own first lessons in politics,
morals, religion, and business, and they wished not to unlearn those
lessons to learn others. They did not blend or assimilate with the
opposite race, but kept themselves apart—justly reasoning that, if their
own institutions were not superior, they were as good as they wished.
The Mexicans were aware of this, and endeavored to change by force, when
it was too late, what they could not otherwise direct.
Mexican Troops in Texas
Some account of the Mexican regular
troops destined for Texas at this period may not be uninteresting. By
the decree of the federal Congress, of the 24th of August, 1826,
provision was made for raising a permanent cavalry force for the defense
of the frontiers. The state of Coahuila and Texas was required to raise
seven companies, of one hundred and twenty-four men, rank and file,
each. One company was to be stationed at La Bahia, and another at Bexar.
By the decree of the state, of the 29th of April, 1826, the
ayuntamientos were authorized to proceed with an armed force, if
necessary, to make levies, and take thence a sufficient number of
individuals to fill the list. Out of the levies, vagrants and disorderly
persons were to be preferred for military service; then single men;
finally, recruits might be raised by entrapment and decoy! Such were to
be the troops for the defense of the frontiers.
But soldiers were little needed during
the year 1827, except to overawe the
Indians, and that duty devolved upon the colonists.
Austin's settlement had so far
progressed, that, in the spring of 1826, Gaspar Flores came to Texas as
commissioner to issue titles to the five hundred families provided for
in the second contract. And, in November, 1827, Austin obtained another
contract for a colony of a hundred families east of the Colorado and
north of the Bexar road.
Early Days of the Independent Mexican Nation
Affairs being thus prosperous with the
colonies, the progress of the Mexican nation, in its new career of
independence, may be noticed. Liberal governments were not slow in
acknowledging the independence of the republic, and in forming
commercial treaties with her. Having adopted her constitution, the first
Congress assembled under it in the beginning of 1825, and Guadalupe
Victoria, her first constitutional president, entered upon his duties,
as did also the vice-president, Nicholas Bravo, on the 1st day of April
of that year.
The antagonism between the republicans
and the aristocracy soon made its appearance. It required only a
nucleus, or rallying-point. It found two. Soon after the inauguration of
John Quincy Adams to the presidency of the United States, he dispatched
Joel R. Poinsett, of South Carolina, as minister of our country to
Mexico. Poinsett was a stern republican, a man of strong intellect, and
an earnest well-wisher of the new republic to which he had been
accredited. As the Mexican nation had taken our federal constitution as
a model for the construction of their own, the republicans of that
country naturally looked to our minister for countenance and advice in
their political labors. Though he refrained from interfering in their
internal concerns, he could hardly avoid making suggestions in his
private conversations. This exasperated the anti-republican party. At
that time the masonic lodges in Mexico were working under the Scotch
rite; but, as a greater antiquity and correctness of masonic usage
attached to the York rite, they requested Poinsett to procure for them
charters authorizing them to work under the latter. Accordingly, as he
was informed by two members of President Victoria's cabinet that the
government did not disapprove of it, he sent for the proper warrant, and
installed them at his own house. The leading members of the Scotch
lodges, being the old Spaniards and aristocracy of Mexico, immediately
connected this affair with the politics of the country. Bravo, the
vice-president, being of the anti-republican party, and perceiving the
influence of the American minister thus thrown in the scale against his
party, employed in his turn whatever influence he possessed against him.
He succeeded in procuring from the legislatures of Puebla and Vera Cruz
petitions to the general government for the dismissal of the American
ambassador from the country. Further to aid him, a papal bull was issued
against the masonic lodges; and a bill was introduced into the national
Congress, and finally passed, for their suppression.
Nevertheless, Bravo was unable to succeed
in the overthrow of the republican party. He next attempted a
revolution; and for this end he raised a small army, and, after making
some approaches toward the capital, returned to Tulancingo, whence he
was dislodged and taken prisoner, but was afterward released. During all
this contest, the French and English ministers, Morier and Ward, were
throwing their influence on the side of the aristocratic party.
In this affair the Mexican republicans
were right; but not so on the other point which they raised. The
revolution had left, among its ill effects, a general hatred against the
natives of Old Spain still residing in Mexico. The nation had long felt
a desire to expel them. Several of the states set the example; and the
general Congress finally, on the 8th of December, 1827, adopted a law
for their expulsion. The congress of Coahuila and Texas did not go so
far, but merely decreed that they should hold no office in church or
state until Spain should acknowledge the independence of the Mexican
republic. These were barbarous laws, violative of the constitution, the
claims of hospitality and humanity, and unworthy of the high stand
Mexico had assumed as a free country. In addition to this, she thus
banished from her society those who possessed nearly all the
intelligence and refinement in the nation. Miserable indeed is the
condition of that country which supposes that its safety requires the
banishment of its most accomplished and useful citizens!
At the period of which we write, the
state of Coahuila and Texas was very poor. The local congress had
employed all its efforts to raise funds; it had even leased out the cock
pits, in order to increase the revenue; but still the treasury was
empty. The colonists in Texas were pretty much exempt from taxation, and
the Mexicans seldom paid any. The latter had no energy; they made
nothing. In fact, they had been stationary for three centuries. What
little they possessed went to pay their priests and decorate their
festivals. A tortilla, a roasted squash, a little boiled milk, and now
and then a curdled cheese, and string-beef dried in the sun, formed
their common diet. The skins of animals furnished their chief clothing.
Such was the condition of the public funds in the spring of 1828, that,
on the 17th of April of that year, the state suspended some of her
constitutional officers, for want of funds to pay them; and the
establishment of the state treasury was also suspended for a like
reason. The days of her poverty were the days of her virtue. The new
governor, Jose Maria Viesca, seemed to conduct himself with great
propriety, and to watch zealously over the interests of his
constituents. Neither he or his congress appeared to have any temptation
to do wrong, or to prolong the legislative sessions beyond the time
required for the more important and necessary business. Yet, even in the
first constitutional congress, monopolies were creeping in. Leon R.
Alemy obtained the exclusive right, for six years, of boring Artesian
wells; John L. Woodbury and John Cameron had a like privilege, for
twenty-three years, of working iron and coal wines in the state; and
John Davis Bradburn and Stephen Staples obtained a similar contract, for
fifteen years, for navigating the Rio Grande with steam or horse power.
By a provision of the state constitution,
the congress should close its sessions with the month of April, unless
prolonged for urgent business. The condition of the treasury required
this to be done. Accordingly, it was prolonged to the middle of May,
during which time the state authorities succeeded in borrowing funds
from the church.
Dewitt's Colony Grows
Colonists in the meantime continued to
emigrate to Texas. In 1827 and 1828 there was quite an addition to
Dewitt's colony. The town of Gonzales had been laid off, and named after
Rafael Gonzales, the provisional governor of the state. On the 29th of
July, 1828,
Austin
obtained another contract, to colonize three hundred families on the
reserved lands on the coast. But most of the immigrants that now began
to settle in Texas came on their own account—some locating in one
colony, and some in others, or on lands not included in any grant. Few
of the empresarios had taken any steps to fulfill their
contracts. Zavalla, Burnett, and Vehlin, had sold out to a New York
company on speculation. The contract of Leftwich fell into the hands of
the Nashville company. The grant of Milam, lying between the Guadalupe
and Colorado rivers, and north of the Bexar road, could not well be
settled because of hostile Indians.
Indian Troubles in Texas
Indeed, during the years 1828 and 1829
the Indians had become troublesome and dangerous to the settlers on the
Colorado and Brazos. Numerous cases of murder and theft had occurred,
and it became necessary to apply a remedy. During the winter of 1828-'9,
Thomas Thompson had opened a small farm near the present town of
Bastrop, and occasionally visited it to cultivate it and take care of
his crops. On going there in July, 1829, he found the Indians in
possession. He returned below for assistance, and obtained ten men, with
whom he approached the Indian camp in the night. At daylight they killed
four of them, and the others fled.
This opened the war. Colonel Austin
raised two companies of volunteers, of fifty men each, under the command
of Captains Oliver Jones and Bartlett Simms; the whole being under the
orders of Colonel Abner Kuykendall. About the same time, the
depredations and murders by the Indians in the vicinity of Gonzales
induced the raising of another company there, under the command of
Captain Henry S. Brown.
Learning that a party of Wacoes and
Twowakanies were encamped at the mouth of the San Saba, the two commands
marched to that point. They halted when near enough, and sent out scouts
to ascertain the localities. The Indian scouts discovered them, and gave
notice to the others; so that, when the Texans charged into the camp of
the enemy, they had fled, and they only succeeded in killing one.
Captain Simms and fifteen others pursued them some miles farther, and
took from them many of their horses. This expedition had a happy effect
in alarming the Indians, and depriving them of many of their animals,
together with their peltries and camp-equipage. The volunteers returned
after an absence of thirty-two days, during which time they suffered
greatly for want of provisions. They subsisted for three days of the
time upon acorns and persimmons!
These annoyances from the Indians
prevented a trade from springing up between Texas and northern Mexico.
Their position was favorable to it. As it was, in 1824, a company of
Bordeaux merchants landed at Copano, with a large quantity of goods for
Santa Fe. They conveyed them some distance beyond San Antonio on packs,
when their animals were stolen by the
Comanches. They then obtained oxen and carts from San Antonio, and
finally succeeded in reaching Santa Fe in safety. During the Mexican
revolution, New Mexico, being remotely situated, wisely took no part in
it. Her intercourse with the rest of the world was thus for many years
cut off, and large sums of gold and silver accumulated within her
limits. The manufactures of other countries were in great demand; and
the venture of the Bordeaux merchants consequently met with
extraordinary success.
The danger from the Indians, however, was
too great to permit a continuance of the intercourse. The United States,
shortly after, opened a route for traffic from St. Louis, and her
merchants realized the benefits of that distant commerce.
The state congress, among its first acts,
at the short session in September, 1828, decreed the removal of the
capital from Saltillo, in the extreme southern corner of the state, to
Monclova, some hundred miles farther to the north.
Trade Restrictions Enacted
Among the colonists in Texas were many
who had left heavy debts against them in the country whence they came.
These debts were, to some extent, sent against them, and generally
placed in the hands of some one in the colony, who was made interested
in their collection. To favor the colonists, it was decreed that they
should not be sued for such debts for twelve years; and further, that
their headright lands should never be subject to the payment of such
debts. This was one of the first decrees of the first session of the
local congress of 1829; but, shortly after, it prohibited merchants of
foreign nations from retailing goods in the state. This gave great
offence to the Texans, and for the reason that they were thus deprived
of the cheapest market, and compelled to purchase their merchandise of
Mexicans.
Peonage System (Indentured Servitude)
The subject of peonage, forming as it
does an important item in the domestic relations of the state, and being
regulated by statutory provisions, requires some notice. By the decree
of the 30th of September, 1828, it was provided that the contract
between the master and servant should be set down at the head of the
account, in presence of witnesses. Articles furnished the servant for
his labor should be at the market price; and the master was forbidden to
credit him for more than a year's wages, except in case of sickness. The
master must show his account to the servant on request; and servants
could sue their masters before an alcalde. Masters or overseers
were authorized to punish idle or disobedient servants by arrest or
confinement with shackles for not more than four days; but the use of
the whip was forbidden. The master was to furnish the servant with
necessary medicines and sustenance during sickness, and charge the same
to his account.
The decree of the 4th of April, 1829,
modified these rules. It prohibited joint accounts against servants;
required masters to retain one third of servants' wages, and apply the
same as a credit on their accounts, except in case of serious sickness,
or the absolute nakedness of the servant and his family; also required
servants, wishing to be employed, to bring a statement from their former
master of the indebtedness to him, and made the new master pay such
debt; masters who charged their servants more than the market price for
articles, were liable to be fined in five times the excess. So much of
the former decree as prohibited the whipping of servants was repealed,
and masters and overseers were permitted to chastise their servants in a
parental manner; but they were responsible for excessive punishment. If
the servant left his master's service, the alcalde could compel
his return, and punish him according to the facts. When the servant
wished to leave his master, he could compel the latter to furnish him a
statement to show to his new master. Actions of servants against their
masters were privileged suits. Masters were not required to bury their
servants who died in their debt.
Such were the rules under which a
majority of the Mexican population were held in perpetual servitude.
Their wages were so extremely low, and their improvidence was so great,
that it was a rare occurrence for one to be out of debt.
Slavery in Texas
The American portion of the population of
Coahuila and Texas had, in lieu thereof, the institution of slavery,
which occupied a peculiar position under the state and federal laws.
The constitution of Coahuila and Texas
made it what is technically called "a free state." It provided
specially, that "from and after the promulgation of the constitution in
the capital of each district, no one should be born a slave in the
state; and, after six months, the introduction of slaves, under any
pretext, should not be permitted." The state congress, in pursuance of
this provision, required the several ayuntamientos to take a list
of the names, ages, and sex of the negroes in their municipalities, at
the end of six months from the promulgation of the constitution; and
also to keep a register of all slaves born in the state after its
publication. The death of slaves was likewise to be noted in the
register. The owners of slaves, dying without children, made the slaves
free; and, when they had children, the tenth part of the slaves were to
be free. This decree further required that free children born of slaves
should receive the best education that could be given them.
It was provided by another decree, passed
in 1827, that any slave who, for convenience, wished to change his
master, could do so, provided the new master would pay the old one the
amount he gave for him, as stated in the bill of sale.
Anarchy in Mexico
Meanwhile, in the capital of Mexico, the
usual scenes of anarchy and bloodshed were transpiring. At the close of
President Victoria's term there was a most excited contest between the
two political parties in regard to his successor. The republican or
federal party brought forward Vincent Guerrero, and the centralists or
strong-government party placed in nomination Manuel Gomez Pedraza, as
their respective candidates. Pedraza was at heart favorable to the
aristocracy, but had occasionally acted with the republicans, which
doubtful course gave him greatly the advantage over Guerrero, who was a
consistent republican, and known to be such. The election came off in
September, 1828; and, although Guerrero had a large majority of the
popular vote, Pedraza received ten states in the electoral college,
while his opponent obtained but eight. In the United States, the
constitution would have taken its course, and such evils would have been
corrected at the ballot-box. Not so in Mexico.
As the president elect was not to be
installed until the following April, the liberal party determined to
place Guerrero in the presidential chair. The movement was
revolutionary, and
Santa
Anna and Zavalla were at the head of it. Santa Anna pronounced at
Xalapa, and Zavalla raised an army in the capital. After a bloody battle
of some days, the party of Guerrero triumphed, and he was installed as
president. The state of Coahuila and Texas, had been favorable to
Guerrero, and approved of the plan of Xalapa; but when the revolution
was over, they recommended a perfect oblivion of passed political
differences, declaring that they would not be parties to a system of
revenge.
Unites States Interested in Acquiring Texas
The United States were not satisfied with
the treaty of 1819, by which Texas had been ceded to Spain. On the 26th
of March, 1825, directly after John Quincy Adams was installed in the
presidential chair, Henry Clay, as secretary of state, gave special
instructions to the American minister to endeavor to procure from Mexico
the retransfer of Texas. The instructions were repeated on the 15th of
March, 1827. Like instructions were given by Martin Van Buren, secretary
of state, on the 25th of August, 1829. In the meantime, however, as good
faith on the part of the United States required a confirmation of the
treaty of limits of 1819, Joel R. Poinsett concluded such a treaty with
the Mexican government on the 12th of January, 1828, with a provision
that the line between the two countries should be run immediately.
James Powers Land Grant
The increase of colonists induced the
granting, on the 11th of June, 1829, to James Powers, of a contract for
settling two hundred families between the Coleto and the Nueces; and to
McMullen and McGloire, on the 17th of August of the same year, a like
contract on territory between the San Antonio and Nueces rivers. A
considerable town had sprung up at La Bahia, and the state congress had
honored it with the name of a ville, and called it Goliad.
The neighborhood of Liberty had been
settled as early as 1805, but scarcely possessed vitality until about
this period, when settlers began to extend along the banks of the
Trinity. About the same time a sparse settlement sprang up on the Texan
side of Red river; but immigrants came and located there on their own
account. Not knowing to what jurisdiction they belonged, they kept aloof
from all municipal laws, except those of their own making, and lived as
they best could. In complexion, however, they were greatly superior to
their predecessors of the neutral ground.
Texas Education System Established
The legislature took some steps to
establish a system of education. Two laws were enacted for this purpose.
The first, in May, 1829, made provision for a school of mutual
instruction, on the Lancastrian plan, in each department. It provided
that the teachers should instruct the pupils in reading, writing,
arithmetic, the dogma of the Roman catholic religion, and all Ackerman's
catechisms of arts and sciences. In April following, the legislature
passed another law, establishing temporary schools on a like plan. But
all this effort resulted in nothing. The people did not second the views
of the legislature. To give an idea of the state of education in Mexico,
we can not do better than refer to the description of an intelligent
eye-witness; — " Ihave just returned," says Mr. Poinsett, "from visiting
a school, and have been much amused with the appearance of the
pedagogue. In a large room, furnished with two or three cowhides spread
on the floor, and half a dozen low benches, were ten or twelve little
urchins, all repeating their lessons as loud as they could bawl. The
master was stalking about the room, with a ferule in his hand, and
dressed in a most grotesque manner. He had an old manta wrapped about
his loins, from under which there appeared the ends of tattered leather
breeches, hanging over his naked legs; sandals were bound round his
ankles; a leather jerkin, the sleeves worn off, and a dirty handkerchief
twisted round his head, above which his shaggy hair stood erect,
completed his dress. He seemed perfectly unconscious of his uncouth
appearance, but received me very courteously, dismissed his scholars
immediately, and at once entered into conversation on the state of the
country.
He told me that he was born in that
house, and had never wandered beyond the precincts of the village.
Several of the country-people came in while we were talking, and treated
the pedagogue with great respect. He appeared to be their oracle."
Those Texan settlements that would
justify it, established private schools for the instruction of their
children. In cases where parents could afford it, their children were
sent to the United States to be educated.
The Church in Early Texas
But little can be said of the religious
progress of the Texans as early as 1830. They may have furnished
certificates of their catholic leaning, but they employed very little of
their time in its exhibition.
Father Henry Doyle, a catholic clergyman,
and a native of Ireland, located himself in the Irish colony, early in
1830, and attended to the religious rites for that portion of Texas. In
addition to the regular priests at San Antonio, Goliad, and Nacogdoches,
there were occasional visits from other catholic ministers to the
different settlements, for the purpose of attending to the ordinances of
the church. Among these was Father Michael Muldoon, likewise from
Ireland—a man of a warm heart, a social and generous spirit, who will be
long held in grateful remembrance by the old settlers of Texas. Anterior
to this, some protestant clergymen visited the eastern part of the
state, and in one or two instances penetrated even as far as San
Antonio; but this will be noticed hereafter.
Slavery Abolished in Texas
The first part of the year 1830 passed
quietly in Texas. Mexico, however, was gradually encroaching upon the
rights of the colonists. The subject of slavery was one cause of it.
Spain, with a view to reestablish her authority in the republic, sent
out from Havana, in July, 1829, an expedition of four thousand men,
under General Barradas. These troops landed at Tampico, and produced
such alarm in Mexico, that the federal Congress, overlooking the
restrictions of the constitution, gave to President Guerrero unlimited
powers. He determined to send a secret agent to Boyer, president of
Hayti, to obtain his aid in exciting the slaves of Cuba to revolt.
Preparatory to this step, Guerrero, acting under the decree appointing
him dictator, proceeded, on the 29th of July, 1829, to abolish slavery
in the Mexican republic.
This proceeding, though high-handed and
in violation of vested rights, was acquiesced in by the Mexican people.
Among the Mexican owners, it was only in the sugar-plantations that the
negro was valuable. "One hundred free negroes," says Edwards, "though
receiving double the wages of the Indian, are found to produce as much
sugar as two hundred do in Cuba, without the owner supporting their
wives and children These negroes are, however, over-paid, and in
consequence become drunkards, vicious, and unruly. Indians, properly
taught, would perform the same labor at half price." And so thought the
Mexicans. They argued that the peons were more profitable, and that
their employers were without the necessity of supporting their families.
The American colonists, however, still
continued the practice of introducing their slaves, under the
appellation of servants. Austin, fearful of the effects of the decree of
abolition on the prosperity of his colony, applied to President
Guerrero, who agreed to modify it in favor of the American colonists.
Guerrero's administration, however, was suddenly closed by his tragic
death. Bustamente, the vice-president, who was a strong centralist,
pronounced against him, drove him from the capital to the mountains,
assumed the presidential chair, and exercised the functions of his
office in a manner so sanguinary and proscriptive, that Guerrero, in
again attempting to resume his station, was taken and shot. Bustamente,
now undisputed master of Mexico, soon exhibited his narrow policy in
regard to the Texan colonies. On the 6th of April, 1830, he issued a
decree, substantially forbidding people of the United States from
settling as colonists in Texas, and suspending all colony contracts
conflicting with this prohibition. By the same decree, the further
introduction of slaves was forbidden.
The congress of Coahuila and Texas,
perplexed with the repeated revolutions in the national capital, and
wishing to keep on good terms with the successful party, did not know
what course to pursue. They ordered a bust of the illustrious Guerrero
to be set up in their hall, but, when adversity came upon him, they
repealed the order. They also named a town after Bustamente, and then,
by another decree, struck out his name!
James Bowie comes to Texas
The September elections of 1830 showed
that Jose Maria Letona was elected governor and Juan Martin Veramendi
vice-governor of the state. This result was favorable to Texas, as the
latter was a resident of San Antonio, and a man of liberal principles.
At this time appeared before the state congress
James Bowie.
He had married a daughter of Veramendi, and under his auspices went to
Saltillo to establish a cotton and woollen manufactory. With this view,
the legislature naturalized him, and granted him a charter; but more
important duties awaited him, and nothing was done.
Oppression of the Texas Colonists
Among the proceedings of the state
congress at this period, as well as in other Mexican states, may be seen
a gradual encroachment upon the alleged rights of the church. The state
would exact loans from it, forbid it from dispatching its ecclesiastical
orders without consent of the secular power, and withdrew the right of
exacting forced contributions for festivals; in fact, the church was
brought into subjection to the civil power. These were seeds sown in the
Mexican republic, which, being well cultivated by the priests, and
properly directed by ambitious leaders, brought forth that bitter fruit
which, in a few years after, the Texans were required to eat.
It was a feeling of jealousy toward the
American colonists in Texas that induced the decree of April 6, 1830.
The privileges allowed them at first, in regard to importations, were
about to cease, and they were to be subdued and made as submissive as
the Mexicans themselves under Bustamente. With a view to this,
customhouses were not only established at Nacogdoches and Bexar, but at
Copano, Velasco, and Galveston, or rather at Anahuac, at the head of the
bay. General M. Miery Teran, a stern and merciless monarchist, was
appointed commandant-general of the eastern states. Colonel John Davis
Bradburn, one of the heroes of Iguala, tired of navigating the Rio
Grande with steam and horse power, had sought and obtained the position
of commander of the forces at Anahuac. Colonel Dominic Ugartachea had
command at Velasco, the port at the mouth of the Brazos; Colonel Piedras
at Nacogdoches; while Don Ramon Musquiz presided as a political chief at
Bexar.
In addition to these high officers,
Ellis P. Bean, a colonel in the regular
army of Mexico, had been stationed in eastern Texas, rather as agent for
the central government to the different
Indian tribes. In the contest which seemed to be now approaching,
neither party appeared willing to trust him. He was assigned a position
at Fort Teran, on the Neches, where was stationed a detachment of
troops. The forces at the foregoing points were as follows; at
Nacogdoches, three hundred and twenty; at Anahuac, one hundred and
fifty; and at Velasco, one hundred and twenty-five. These, with the two
presidial companies at Bexar and Goliad, constituted the Mexican power
that was to overawe twenty thousand colonists, and bring them to submit
to the arbitrary measures of Vice-President Bustamente. The state
congress, among its last decrees, placed one hundred and fifty more
troops at the disposal of General Teran. The character of these forces
may be inferred from the description furnished by the law, and given on
a previous page, of the kind of soldiers preferred.
Colonel Bradburn took the first step in
carrying out the views of his superiors. He introduced martial law for
the citizens; he took from them their property without their consent and
without consideration; he had many of them arrested and imprisoned in
the fort of Anahuac; and his troops, who were guilty of robbery
and stealing, were by him protected from punishment.
These were some of the grievances of
which the colonists of Texas complained before the close of the year
1830. It was not the entertainment to which they had been invited!
[Next Section of
Texas History:
Mexican Hostilities
Towards the Colonists] |