Battle of Mobile Bay
|
This Site:
|
AUGUST 27, 1864.] HARPER'S WEEKLY. 547 (Previous Page) "a sovereign State should be unaccountable to all else but Deity." CALHOUN and the secession philosophers, Bishop HOPKINS and the slavery apologists, are of course duly eulogized, and Europe is called upon to recognize the Confederacy that has so nobly maintained itself: this, it appears, being the kind of political information which the members of the society are so anxious to diffuse.
In the course of the work Mr.
WRIGHT censures Mr. MOTLEY'S letter to the London Times at the opening of our
war; but adds, by way of comfort to the enemies of the American Union, that "Mr.
HENRY B. DAWSON has a rod in pickle that will be sufficient to whip him [Mr.
MOTLEY] into the traces." The context shows Mr. WRIGHT'S perfect familiarity
with Mr. DAWSON'S views. " The chief point of difference between us is that he
[Mr. HENRY B. DAWSON] considers the word ' nation' should never be used in
connection with the United States, each State being the only ' nation,' whereas
it appears to the writer [Mr. WRIGHT] that, with clear conceptions that each
State is the real nation, the United States may properly be called a ' nation'
of nations. Mr. DAWSON'S edition of the Federalist has been alluded to, and his
valuable notes will be found coincident with the views herein taken, and will be
followed with the publication of other debates connected with the adoption of
our Constitution, most opportune, and furnishing important information of which
few have knowledge His extensive
This is the useful political knowledge which is diffused, in the " Society's" own style and grammar, of the new edition of the Federalist; namely, that it is edited by (as Mr. JAY informs us) an Englishman, Mr. HENRY B. DAWSON, who has already, in print, charged, without proving, General PUTNAM with complicity in ARNOLD'S treason ; and who now undertakes, as Mr. Jar contends, to shake the national reverence for the men who exposed the essential folly of the doctrine of State sovereignty ; to show that the evils of the old Confederacy did not spring from the nature of the bond; and that the Constitution was foisted upon the nation by false pretenses and political trickery. Every one who reads Mr. DAWSON'S introduction can judge from its tone whether his editorial intention was to strengthen or to weaken public respect for the authors of the Federalist, and to confirm or destroy the conviction, essential to the maintenance of the Union, that we are a nation and not a Confederacy. But while this may be a matter of inference from the intro: eduction, the quotations from the work of Mr. WRIGHT'S, which Mr, JAY publishes in his " Second Letter," leave little doubt that the intention of Mr. DAWSON'S edition of the Federalist is to show us that " we are all wrong about the theory of our Government ;" that sovereignty belongs to the States, not to the nation ; that, consequently, secession is a reserved right ; the war against secession wicked, and the Union at an end. TO UNION MEN.THE rebel papers, considering that they are printed in what they call another country, are curiously interested in the political movements of this country. They print long columns of anxious speculation, and then assure us that they have no shadow of interest in the matter, and that their contempt for us and our affairs exceeds expression. A recent performance of this kind in the Richmond Examiner is peculiarly amusing. It thinks it sees signs that the Administration is to be defeated, and it can not conceal its joy. Its ribaldry is as remarkable as in the days that followed Sumter, when it was full of fervid longings that the Yankees would only come down and be soundly flogged by the slaves, since Southern gentlemen disdained the dirty business of whipping them with their own hands. Since then, however, at Vicksburg, at New Orleans, at Gettysburg, and in Virginia and Georgia the Southern gentlemen were not disinclined to try their hands ; and it is a curious and interesting fact that they have whipped the Yankees all the way from Gettysburg to Petersburg, and from the Ohio to Atlanta, and will probably not be satisfied until they have whipped the scoundrels into the Gulf. The Richmond Examiner says with solemn exultation, in words that are the just indication of the dignity of the rebel cause and the honorable spirit in which it is conducted : " The obscene ape of Illinois is about to be deposed from the Washington purple He was in the eyes of all mankind an unanswerable argument for our secession ; he stood there a living justification, seven feet high, of the steadfast resolution of these States to hold no more political union with a race capable not only of producing such a being, but of making it a ruler and king." There is a great deal more in this strain, which is peculiar to a baby-selling chivalry—a strain in which JEFFERSON Davis showed himself an accomplished adept when he called him fellow citizens against whom he has drawn the sword "hyenas." But such articles show, what is not sufficiently apprehended by ourselves, the moral value of the maintenance of the Administration. Contemporary with this Administration, the war for the Union is necessarily identified with it. The rebels and their friends the Copperheads have constantly denounced it as "LINCOLN'S war;" while our own foreign friends and enemies have always regarded the President as the accepted exponent of the war. The rebels undoubtedly mean, therefore, to show a brave front until after the election. They know if, by holding on, they can only fatigue or dishearten loyal men to the point of declaring that they must have a change merely for the sake of change, that the defeat of Mr. LINCOLN will be accepted by their own population as a sign of desire to compromise and yield, while it will be understood by foreign powers in the same way, and assure them that the hour has come for successful mediation, recognition, or interference. The one thing which, under the circumstances, would be the most valuable to the rebels is the defeat of Mr. LINCOLN ; while, on the other hand, his re-election would be the most shattering blow to them. For it would say plainly to the whole world that the loyal people of the United States, while they differed upon many points of policy, were heartily agreed upon the one great essential aim of the maintenance of the Union by arms against all who by arms seek its overthrow : that failures of many kinds were inseparable from all human enterprises ; that, as they had begun, they meant to finish ; and that while there were many faithful and devoted patriots in their ranks, there was no one more faithful or more devoted than the President, who had borne so patiently the heat and burden of the day. Any change whatever shows some kind of dissatisfaction with the war and its policy. But the re-election of the President reveals a grim and impregnable resolution, the earnest of absolute victory. AN ARMISTICE.A CRY for an armistice is sometimes heard. Let us stop fighting for six months, shouts some newspaper or orator, and call a Convention of the North and South, and see if they haven't had enough of it, and on what conditions they will come back. It might be replied to this suggestion that the rebels began this war by firing upon Fort Sumter, have maintained it ever since, and do not ask for an armistice. The Government is merely maintaining its existence, and is ready to stop fighting the moment its enemies retire from the contest. Can it honorably expose itself to the insults as well as to the blows of rebels ? To this it is answered that the question is too grave to be settled upon points of etiquette, and that the Government can postpone its dignity until it ascertains whether the rebels refuse offers of conciliation. But no Government can postpone its dignity without fatal harm. If a Convention should be offered and spurned the result would not be the union of the North, as prophesied—it would be loyal indignation with the weakness of the Government, and Copperhead assertion that it was the fault of the Government that the project failed. Whatever the issue of the proposition the Government must lose. If it were refused, the entire responsibility would be thrown upon it by its enemies. If it were accepted, who would guarantee that the rebels would abide by the result of the Convention? They believe absolutely in State rights ; are they likely to relinquish that faith upon our summons, who have been fighting them upon that very point for three years? If they say they will relinquish it, does any body propose to believe them? Or again, are any better terms of union possible than the Constitution of the United States, which the rebels repudiate ? The rebellion is not a new thing in intention. They plead total incompatibility of political conviction and social principle with us. The whole generation of fighting men among them has been carefully educated in that belief. They think that the tendency of the country under the Constitution is to the destruction of those convictions and principles. In the midst of a war in which they yet have great armies in the field, are they likely to change their belief at the invitation of those whom they regard as enemies? They would use the armistice to strengthen their lines ; their allies, the Copperheads among ourselves, would use it to distract and divide the North ; and if the negotiations failed it would be found, as it always is, that the proposer of the armistice had lost all its advantages. The rebels discuss these questions as well as we. The Richmond Examiner warns the Chicago Convention that the only chance of its party lies in proposing an armistice, and upon what conditions ? These : " a formal renunciation of all right and pretense to coerce these States; and, of course, an entire withdrawal of all land and sea forces." Then, says the paper, the Northern States will be in a condition to propose reconstruction and a Convention to negotiate the terms. What is this but asking us to concede that States have the right to secede—that the Union is dissolved—and that a new convention may decide upon a new Constitution ? The Examiner does not promise a favorable result of such a policy ; but it will be observed that it does not insist upon separation. Why should it, since by the very terms precedent separation is conceded ? When we allow that the old Union is gone, they profess their possible willingness to consider the formation of a new one. But if they think it unadvisable to form a new one, we shall have renounced the right " to coerce States." This is the feast to which " an armistice" invites us ; and does any body seriously suppose the rebels will meet us in conventions while our armies and navies are upon the Southern coasts and in the Southern centres? This war will end in one of two ways ; either the rebellion will overthrow the Government, or the Government will subdue the rebellion. FARRAGUT.THE part of the navy in the summer's campaign, if it begins late, begins gloriously. FARRAGUT has already joined his name to those most cherished in our naval history, and no such history is more splendid than the American. Our children will speak of FARRAGUT as we speak of PERRY and DECATUR, of LAWRENCE and PREBLE. The action at the mouth of Mobile Bay reminds us of the remark made by the traitor Commodore BARRON, who was captured at Hatteras Inlet. He was in Fort Warren, and heard the recital from a newspaper of FARRAGUT'S victorious entry at New Orleans. Profoundly interested, and forgetting his treason, and remembering only the glory of the service with which his own name had been honorably associated, BARRON exclaimed, vehemently, "Yes, yes ; I tell you nothing can stand against our navy." There is not a loyal man or boy, not a true woman or girl, in the land who does not rejoice in the victory of FARRAGUT and his gallant men, or grieve in sympathy with the hearts that bleed for CRAVEN and his honored crew. The duty of the navy in this war has been enormous and difficult, but how bravely it has been done ! Its victories have been, in a sense, more impressive than any others. The baffling of the Merrimac, the passing Fort Jackson, the destruction of the huge rebel ram the Mississippi and the reduction of New Orleans, PORTER'S exploits upon the Western waters, the sinking of the Alabama, and now the occupation of Mobile Bay, are all single events that shine with signal lustre in the story of the war. We do not enter into the Monitor quarrel. That they are totally useless no one who remembers the day in Hampton Roads is likely to believe, while that very day may have caused too great confidence in them as the only valuable vessels. FARRAGUT'S feeling about " fighting in an iron kettle" is very intelligible, nor less so his love of hearts of iron in ribs of oak. Certainly the oaken ribs of a certain flag-ship Hartford will not soon be despised or forgotten. The operations at Mobile may proceed, or the end in view may be already accomplished by the possession of the bay. But whatever follows, the sailors of the Union stand side by side with its soldiers. Over the heads of each floats the same old flag. In the hearts of each burns the same invincible purpose—Union and Liberty ! "The army and navy forever, And three cheers for the red, white, and blue."
DOMESTIC INTELLIGENCE.
|
|
||
|
Site Copyright 2003-2018 Son of the South. For Questions or comments about this collection, contact paul@sonofthesouth.net |
|
Are you Scared and Confused? Read My Snake Story, a story of hope and encouragement, to help you face your fears. |