This Site:
Civil War
Civil War Overview
Civil War 1861
Civil War 1862
Civil War 1863
Civil War 1864
Civil War 1865
Civil War Battles
Confederate Generals
Union Generals
Confederate History
Robert E. Lee
Civil War Medicine
Lincoln Assassination
Slavery
Site Search
Civil War Links
Civil War Art
Mexican War
Republic of Texas
Indians
Winslow Homer
Thomas Nast
Mathew Brady
Western Art
Civil War Gifts
Robert E. Lee Portrait
|
GEN. WILLIAM T. SHERMAN.
WE
give on the
preceding page a
portrait of Major-General
WILLIAM T. SHERMAN,
commanding the Department of the Mississippi, just
now prominently before the country in connection
with the Federal victories in Georgia. General
SHERMAN
is forty-six years of age, and is regarded
as one of the ablest officers in the service. A sketch of his life was published
in No. 376 of the
Weekly,
March 12, 1864.
TOUCH THEM TENDERLY.
0
TOUCH them tenderly; they fell In the harsh storm of shot and shell;
When, like a vast Plutonian bell,
Rang the responding air To artillerean thunder-strokes, Shivering a chained
nation's yokes, The steepling pines and spreading oaks
Fell with the soldiers there.
Touch tenderly these sons of Mars;
Wrap
SEDGWICK in the flag of stars;
Sponge the brave blood from
WADSWORTH'S
scars, Through which his spirit fled
From honor here to glory where
The banner blue in fields of air
Is bright with stars forever fair,
Without the stripes of red.
Touch tenderly the living braves : Blessed be the gentle hand that saves A hero
! while our banner waves
The loyal heart will beat
With quicker pulses where they tread. Bind softly the poor wounds that bled
Where the wild-flowers their odors shed,
Making the free air sweet.
Touch tenderly the gallant men
Who smile at their red wounds, and then Ask to be ordered back again,
To join the fight anew;
To go where
GRANT and
HANCOCK lead; To follow
BUTLER, BURNSIDE, MEADE;
To watch and march and charge and bleed Where waves the starry blue.
Touch tenderly the man whose life Is dear to mother, sweet-heart, wife, Whose
blood was poured out in the strife
Of liberty with crime;
For braver than the Spartan band
Are the defenders of
the land,
Who like a living bulwark stand,
Each crowned with deeds sublime.
HARPER'S WEEKLY.
SATURDAY, JUNE 4, 1864.
OUR WAR
MAPS.
THE
readers of HARPER'S
WEEKLY will
find it
for their
advantage to preserve for constant reference the two
elaborate and complete Maps
of the Seat
of War
published in the last Number. Every important place and
position is so carefully
laid down in these Maps that
the reader can trace upon them,
from day to day, the
movements
of our armies under
GRANT in Virginia
and under
SHERMAN
in Georgia, and those
of the enemy
under
LEE and
JOHNSTON, opposed to them.
They can
thus gain a clear and intelligent view
of the design and
effect
of the various movements
and counter-movements
of the belligerents.
"
NOT EVERY ONE THAT SAITH
LORD ! LORD!"
THE
papers which were lately suspended in
this city profess an overpowering regard for the Government and the Union. They
will not deny that the war for the maintenance of both has reached a most
important crisis. They will agree that it is the duty of all good citizens who
wish, as well as profess to wish, that the rebellion may be conquered forever,
to make every allowance for the exercise at such a time of that supreme
discretion which necessarily belongs to every Government. They will be disposed
to view the acts of the Government, even when irritating and ill judged, as not
leveled at the liberties of the citizen but at the crimes of rebels. They will
concede that at a moment like this the publication of a forged proclamation
of the President to the effect that the struggle
is going disastrously against us is an offense of the gravest kind, whose
tendency is to strike a fatal blow at the cause for which hundreds of thousands
of our fellow citizens are fighting and falling in the field. They can not
seriously plead that it is only " a hoax," nor mean soberly
to excuse themselves by saying that they had left their columns without any
responsible supervision. Their columns, by their own confessed negligence, have
been made the vehicle of a damaging blow at the Union and Government to which
they so zealously profess their devotion,
and however sincerely they may deplore the order by which they were suspended,
they will honorably allow that, under the circumstances, they ought to suffer
some kind of penalty,
and will believe that the suppression, however mistaken an act, came from
patriotic zeal rather than from despotic tyranny.
Now let every candid man decide whether, granting that the suppression of those
papers was ill judged, their comments upon the act show a sincere desire to
forbear with the Government, or whether they are not intended to do
exactly what the forged
proclamation they
published was meant to do—namely, to perplex the Government of the United
States, dishearten the loyal armies, encourage the rebels, and invite foreign
interference ?
It is strange, of course, that journals which, by their own account, are so
devoted to the salvation of the country, should put the worst conceivable
interpretation upon every act of the Government; should stimulate opposition to
the raising of soldiers by draft; should resist with an acrimony that might,
except for that professed devotion,
be called partisan the whole policy of the Government; very strange
indeed that papers so zealously loyal in profession should constantly denounce
the Government so much more fiercely than the rebellion that they are
universally considered as virtual friends of the rebels. But such is the
perversity of man. And there are probably people to be found at this moment, and
intelligent and loyal people too, who sincerely believe that both of those
journals, if they were swindled, hoped that the
proclamation might begenuine ; people who think that it is not a hearty
loyalty to the Government which makes them daily depict the Government as the
real enemy of our liberties ; people, in fine, who believe that neither of the
journals, so professedly loyal,
would be very sorely grieved if the Government of the United States
should be overthrown by a compromise with rebels. It is our firm faith that such
people could be found. And if it were indeed so, how well might the papers in
question exclaim, "Of what avail then are the loudest professions of loyalty !"
TWO GLIMPSES OF JEFFERSON
DAVIS.
WE have
lately had two glimpses of
JEFFERSON
DAVIS, sad and gloomy
enough. About a month ago a little son of his fell from a balcony and was
killed, and on the Sunday afternoon after the funeral, which was the day
subsequent to the
battle of the Wilderness,
DAVIS is described sitting
alone in his pew in church, clad in deep black, a figure of utter grief and woe.
The second glimpse is at the funeral of the rebel General J. E. B.
STUART. It took place at a
late hour in the afternoon. The scene was most dreary. " The short service was
read "as if there must be no time lost. The guns that threatened
Richmond with
justice roared beyond the city. No military escort accompanied the procession to
the grave; but chief of all during the burial service at the church,
JEFFERSON DAVIS is seen
sitting near the front "with a look of grief upon his care worn face."
Care worn his face may well be at a soldier's funeral, for he has caused more
funerals, more agonized heart breaks, more comfortless sorrow, than any man the
sun now looks upon. Not is there probably a more wretched being in the world.
Baffled in his ambitious and long plotted schemes, unsupported by those upon
whom he counted in the North, deserted and disdained by the British Government,
sick and sad in mind and body, his huge crime is unrelieved by a solitary ray of
extenuation or excuse. That his theory of the National Government might honestly
differ from ours may be admitted ; but that he should assert a mere theory,
without the least excuse of oppression, at such cost of blood and sorrow, is
itself an atrocity. While to assert it, as he and his fellows have done, for the
basest and most odious of purposes, is an unspeakable wickedness. Even could he
succeed, and his Confederacy acquire a position among recognized states, the
infamy of its origin could no more be forgotten than the source of a fortune
which sprang from the slave trade.
Even could the effort to destroy the Union and divide the country prosper, the
object of the destruction would be forever remembered. Grant the success;
concede that the rebellion triumphs; do you think
JEFFERSON
DAVIS would rank in history with
MILTIADES, with
CURTIUS, With
ALNOLD VON WINCKLEREID,
with WILLIAM TELL,
with WASHINGTON,
with BOLIVAR,
with GARIBALDI?
Would his name he hailed with
love and enthusiasm as a friend of humanity ? No. His epitaph would have no
higher heroic strain than this : " He destroyed a great, powerful and prosperous
nation because it refused to be degraded, and because he wished to whip women
and sell babies unchallenged." In American history the crime of
BENEDICT ARNOLD
disappears before that of
JEFFERSON DAVIS. The gloom that shrouded him in these two glimpses in the
church will never pass away from his figure as it is seen in history--the gloom
of unrelieved infamy.
THE SPIRIT OF THE ARMY.
IF any body is
troubled by the fact that there are skulkers from our armies, let him remember
that it is so every where, and in all armies. When
General
SIDNEY JOHNSON
was in the rebel command in Tennessee he issued an order, the details of which
we take from the
Richmond Examiner
of that time, by which every captain was to call the roll of his company before
going into action, and again upon coming out, when every man who was not dead,
wounded, or absent
upon leave, was to be court martialed for cowardice. Carrying the wounded from
the field during action was prohibited, and every
man going to the rear upon any pretense was to be shot by the file officers.
There are doubtless some skulkers in our armies ; but the spirit of the Union
soldiers as a mass is unsurpassed and insuperable. An eye witness tells us that
the Army of the Potomac began with faith in General
GRANT, but that the first week's fighting so endeared him to them that
the faith has become a kind of worship, and
the army moves and fights under that inspiration as one hero. The same
spirit seizes them every where ; and we know of one of the best cavalry
regiments in the service, on duty elsewhere, which, notwithstanding the
preference of all
cavalry for its own branch, has asked to be dismounted and
sent to the front as infantry to fight under
GRANT.
We do not wonder the eye witness declares that he and the army have no more
doubt of
success than of the sun's rising.
FORGETFULNESS.
THE
Richmond
Examiner,
of May 12, exclaims : " Heaven and earth now call upon the Government to bring
up all the troops at its command ;" and the
Sentinel,
of May
19, says :
"If
we can conquer now—and God is giving us the promise of it—our work will be
done." Both these papers forget what the Virginian,
THOMAS JEFFERSON, said long ago : " The Almighty
has no attribute which can take side with us in such a contest." The contest
which JEFFERSON
contemplated was exactly that which the rebellion is waging, an attempt to
remove
the"
only firm basis" of the liberties of a nation;
namely, " a conviction in the minds of the people
that these liberties are the gift of God, that they are not to be violated but
with his wrath."
THE "RE GALANTUOMO."
THIS
noble old ship of a Power which has steadily befriended us during our great
struggle, torn and shattered by the tempest
in
which she was long supposed to have been lost, arrived at Naples about the first
of May. She took from
New York one passenger only, the guest of Commodore
ISOLA, and from him we have received an interesting letter, from which we make
the following extracts :
" The journal I send
(Il
Pungolo, Naples, May 5) can not give you an idea of the joy that pervades
the whole country. Forty thousand people shouting for joy is a spectacle not
often seen or heard ; while more substantial tokens of the general interest felt
in the Re Galantuomo are not wanting. A grand banquet is to be given to all,
even the crew, and the city is to be illuminated Commodore
ISOLA was as courteous and solicitous for the welfare of his solitary
guest amidst all the trouble and anxiety of our fearful storm as in the first
bright days out of New York, and the pleasant sail from the Azores to Gibraltar,
and thence to Naples. The officers are simply heroes. Their courage, brave
endurance, and straightforward duty
doing when all hope had gone (for we were without hope for three days),
is something not to be forgotten. And yet, withal, so unostentatious and quiet.
I shall love Italy and the Italians while I live. What a noble thing it was
those frigates searching for us ! They should know how heartily it is
appreciated. The formal acknowledgments and decorations and honors of the
Italian Government do not tell half the warm gratitude all on board the Re
Galantuomo feel toward them."
The journal Il Pungolo describes at length, and with enthusiasm, the festal
reception of the good ship in Naples ; and after a vivid account of the storm,
during which only two men were injured, and all were heroes, as our
correspondent writes, the editor exclaims, with natural pride, " With sailors
like these Italy may certainly soon become one of the great maritime powers of
the world." The circumstances connected with the Re Galantuomo have served to
bind this country only the more closely to the land of CAVOUR, of GARIBALDI, and
of VICTOR EMANUEL. Viva GARIBALDI !
Viva il Re Galantuomo !
GREAT BATTLES.
WHILE all our minds are so intent upon the
fierce Virginia fights, and of speculation upon their
probable consequences, it will be useful to remember the facts of other
great historic battles.
The details of the old Greek and Persian and Roman contests are of course more
or less fanciful, but they doubtless
indicate the relative forces. At Marathon the Athenians are said to have
had 10,000 ; the Persians 110,000.
The Athenians lost 192 ; the
Persians 6400, and were defeated. Then
came XERXES with his fabulous army, which is
given in detail, horse and foot, fleet, army, and followers, at
2,500,000. Against this invasion 7000 Greeks held the Pass of Thermopylae, and
upon the marble lion of LEONIDAS was
the inscription : "Here 4000
Peloponnesians fought with 3,000,000
of foes." HERODOTUS, who loves a generous measure,
says there were 5 000,000. At Arbela the tradition
makes ALEXANDER THE GREAT with 47,000
horse and foot defeat 1,040,000 Persians. At Cannae
HANNIBAL had 50,000, and of the 80,000 Romans
destroyed 50,000, so that only fragments of the Roman force escaped. At
Pharsalia Julius CESAR with 22,000
routed POMPEY with 52,000.
In later times GUSTAVUS VASA at Lutzen with
18,500 foot and horse defeated WALLESTEIN with
15,000. At Blenheim, one of the pivotal battles in
European history, the final check to Louis THE
FOURTEENTH'S ambition, the French and Bavarians
under TALLARD were 60,000 with 61 guns ; the Allies
under MARLBOROUGH and Prince EUGENE were
56,000 with 52 guns. The battle wavered at intervals
during the day, but at last, with a loss of 5000
killed and 8000 wounded, MARLBOROUGH almost
destroyed the French army, which lost 12,000 killed,
14,000 prisoners, all its guns, with its General
and 1200 officers. Not more than 20, 000 of its effective
men ever reassembled. At Pultowa CHARLES
THE TWELFTH with 24, 000 men fought nearly 60,000
Russians. CHARLES was defeated, and lost nearly
half of his army.
The NAPOLEON campaigns are the story of the
most sanguinary battles. Yet in Egypt, at the famous battle of the Pyramids at
the beginning of his career,
NAPOLEON, with 10,000 French under
KLEBER, routed 80,000 Egyptians and destroyed
the Mamelukes; and the French loss, according
to PATON, the latest authority, after nineteen hours
of severe exertion, was no more than 10 killed and
30 wounded. At Marengo NAPOLEON, with 28,000,
defeated 31,000 Austrians, killing 7000 and capturing
3000, with artillery and standards, and losing about 7000. At Austerlitz the
Allies were 75,000 strong, NAPOLEON 80,000. The Allies were overwhelmed,
losing 10,000 killed, 20,000 prisoners, 185
guns, 400 caissons, and 45 standards. At Wagram
NAPOLEON had a magnificent army of 150,000 foot,
30,000 cavalry, and 750 guns. The Allies brought
into action more than 140,000. The battle was indecisive.
The loss on each side was about 25,000,
and the French captured a few guns. At Borodino
the French counted 125,000, the Russians 130,000.
The latter lost 52,000, the former 30,000. In the
whole Russian campaign, of an army which is roundly
reckoned at 500,000, NAPOLEON lost 125,000 killed, 193,000 captured, and
132,000 dead of hunger, disease, and
exposure. Yet the next year he crossed
the Rhine again with an army of 350,000. At Leipsic, with 175,000 men and 750
guns, he was defeated by the
Allies with nearly 300,000 men and
more than 1300 guns. The battle raged for three days, and was one of the most
fiercely contested ever known. The French lost more than 60,000, the Allies more
than 40,000. The tough old Tory ALISON says that it was this battle which "delivered
Europe from French bondage." But NAPOLEON
made one more and final effort. He began
the four days' campaign of Waterloo with 130,000
men. Upon the actual field the best authorities
give the English 49,608 foot, 12,402 horse, 5645 artillery,
with 156 guns ; in all, 67,655, of which about
24,000 were British. The French had 48,950 foot, 15,765 horse, 7232
artillery, with 246 guns ; in all,
71,947. The battle lasted for eight hours. The British loss was 15,000 killed
and wounded. The French army was virtually destroyed, and NAPOLEON
BONAPARTE with it.
The battles of our Revolution were hardly more
than skirmishes. On Long Island the Americans had about 5000 men, of
which they lost 2000. The British
had 15,000 men, with 40 guns. Their loss was about 400. At Trenton we had about
2400 engaged with 1500 Hessians. They lost 36 and we 4. At Monmouth the forces
were about 12,000 on each side. The Americans lost 200 killed and wounded, the
British about 300. In the battle of
the Brandywine WASHINGTON had about 11,000 effective
men, Lord HOWE about 18,000. The British lost about 600 killed and
wounded. The American
loss was greater, but no exact returns were ever made. At Saratoga, perhaps the
most decisive battle of the Revolution, our force was 12,000,
militia and regulars, and BURGOYNE'S not more
than 6000. At Camden CORNWALLIS, with a little
more than 2000 regulars, routed our miscellaneous
force of 6000. We lost 900 killed and as many prisoners ; the British lost in
all 325. In the Revolutionary
siege of Yorktown the Americans and French were 16,000, the British 8000. During
the siege our loss was about 300 killed and wounded,
the British about 550.
Of all these contests those of Marathon, Arbela,
Pultowa, Blenheim, Waterloo, and Saratoga are ranked by Professor CREASY
as among "the decisive battles of
the world." If the great campaign of the spring in this country shall result in
a full triumph of the national arms, it will not be the least of those decisive
battles.
ART-CRITICISM.
Mr. W. H. Beard:
DEAR SIR,—In the Tribune of May 21 you address
a letter to me, justly assuming that I wrote an
article entitled " Art-Criticism" in Harper's Weekly of May 7. That
article was suggested by time rejoinders to the Tribune criticisms upon
pictures, which, so far as I had
heard or read them, consisted of personal vituperation and even menace of
the critic. I therefore wrote the article to which you allude, in which I assert
the right of every man to express
his opinion of pictures however unsound his
philosophy, distasteful his style, or erroneous his
conclusions, or gross his ignorance may appear to
any one else, provided always that he does not personally asperse the
artist. The criticisms in question, sweeping, severe, ignorant, and arrogant as
they have been called, did not seem to me to be
properly described as personal attacks upon the artists
criticised; and in my zeal I wrote that the most exasperated artist dared
not call them so. You reply that you "not only dare but do" say that they are
little else than personal attacks, and that in
your own case especially the " criticism" is not so much an attack upon
your art as upon your moral character.
I have read the articles again, as you suggest,
but I still can not agree with you that they are personal attacks. The
remarks upon your Dance of Silenus
are certainly a wholesale condemnation of that picture. It is described
as " low," with other epithets that I need not repeat, and as tending to the
corruption of youth. But that you are " low," (Next
Page)
|