Civil War Overview
Civil War 1861
Civil War 1862
Civil War 1863
Civil War 1864
Civil War 1865
Civil War Battles
Robert E. Lee
Civil War Medicine
Civil War Links
Republic of Texas
Civil War Gifts
Robert E. Lee Portrait
Charleston was occupied by our troops the bust
John C. Calhoun, in the office of the Mercury,
was dashed to the ground and broken by a female slave.]
WHAT though a prophet had
pronounced the word, With solemn warnings, in the years gone by, Ere death had
closed the grave Calhoun's stern eye, While yet in Senate halls his voice was
heard Uplifted in defense of that great Wrong—That ancient curse whose cruel
gyves and yokes, Inhuman brands and harsh inflicted strokes, Have stained the
honor of our land so long—And had declared the time would soon come round When
one of that oppressed and servile race Should lift the statesman's image from
its place, And dash it into fragments on the ground—Who would have heeded the
words been spoken ? And yet today his sculptured bust lies broken.
IT was on the 18th of February
General SHERMAN took Columbia.
BEAUREGARD, who had just left that point,
placed his army so as to cover the approach to Charlotte, deeming that line of
greater importance to the safety of Richmond.
SHERMAN, while making a strong feint in
BEAUREGARD'S front, moved his main column to Camden and Florence. Intelligence
which is thought to be trust worthy makes it evident that SHERMAN was, on the
1st of March, some miles north of Florence, at Cheraw, on the North Carolina
border. In that case he is apparently aiming at Raleigh. There are two columns
co-operating with his advance in that direction
TERRY'S from Wilmington and SCHOFIELD'S from
Newbern. A dispatch from General LEE to the rebel Secretary of War indicates
SCHOFIELD'S column, on the 8th, encountered the
combined forces of HILL and HOKE, under General BRAGG, near Kinston. A battle
was fought, in which SCHOFIELD was driven back, after having " disputed the
ground obstinately," with a loss of three guns and a portion of his skirmish
line taken prisoners. Kinston is 20 miles east of Goldsborough. On the 9th the
enemy attacked and was severely repulsed, leaving his dead and wounded on the
field, and losing several hundred prisoners. BRAGG attacked again on the 10th,
and was so badly beaten that he was forced to withdraw to the north side of the
Neuse. In connection with General SCHOFIELD'S command the illustrations given on
page 181 of that General's head quarters at Wilmington, and of the badge of his
corps, will have great interest to our readers.
A dispatch received from General
SHERMAN, dated Laurel Hill, North Carolina (30 miles southwest from
Fayetteville), March 8, states that he had reached that point, and that all was
going on finely.
SHERMAN'S march northward from Columbia has not
been rapid, which is probably due to the state of the roads. But the slower his
march the more completely will he exhaust the country of food and forage
absolutely indispensable to
LEE'S army. The rebel journals have lately
charged SHERMAN with having burned Columbia. Now, it is certainly true that the
public property was burned, but if any thing else suffered it was by accident.
This is proved by the fact that the houses of Generals HAMPTON and PRESTON are
left standing. The Augusta Constitutionalist, a rebel organ, says that "few, if
any, private residence, were entered. If any outrages were committed on ladies
it is not known. The enemy were under strict discipline and orders during their
march....They marched as if they had just started on their expedition, instead
of having been out for weeks."
The victory of SHERIDAN over
EARLY'S command, in the Valley, has been confirmed except in the single fact of
the capture of EARLY himself. Eight cannon were captured, and 1300 prisoners,
which have been sent to Washington. The battle took place near Waynesborough,
probably on the 1st of March. SHERIDAN'S army, after the battle at Waynesborough,
moved to Charlottesville, which was surrendered without a fight ; and, after two
days' halt at this place, until the ammunition and pontoon trains should come
up, moved in two divisions southward toward the James. The route taken by these
separate columns may be traced on the map which we give on page 179. One
division, under General DEVEN, took a directly southern route to Scottsville,
destroying all mills, merchandise, and bridges on the line of march, and along
the Rivanna River to Columbia. The other division proceeded down on the railroad
to Lynchburg, destroying it as far as to Amherst a distance of over 40 miles.
From Scottsville DEVEN'S division proceeded westward along the banks of the
James, destroying every lock on the canal as far as to Duguldsville, 20 miles
SHERIDAN dates his dispatch from Columbia on
the 10th. Up to that date he had captured 14 guns. We give on page 185 an
illustration of this new " ride" of PHIL SHERIDAN'S across the creeks of the
Valley. He started from Winchester on the 27th of February.
In the Southwest Mobile is the
prominent centre of interest. The rumors to the effect that that city was being
evacuated were so far unfounded that, instead of evacuating, the rebels have for
weeks been strengthening the position against a Federal attack. The citizens
have been summoned to arms, and a whole batch of rebel generals have been
inciting them on to a gallant defense of the city. Among these is BEAUREGARD,
who is ever present at that point of the Confederacy which is slipping out of
DAVIS'S hands. Like BRAGG, he has come to be recognized as a "signal of
distress." There are two Federal corps, SMITH'S and GRANGER'S, operating against
the city. These are under the command of
General CANBY. Pascagoula is the proper base
for operations against Mobile. It is not improbable, after all, that upon the
approach of CANBY who will, of course, hold every line of retreat the garrison
defending the city will follow the example of HARDEE at Savannah and
Charleston, and march out while there is an
SATURDAY, MARCH 25, 1865. THE LAST MASK GONE.
MR. HUNTER'S argument in the
rebel Senate is unanswerable. It leaves the rebellion utterly without the shadow
of pretense. We seceded from the Federal Government, he says, because it
threatened to touch slavery ; and now we propose to allow the Confederate
Government to meddle with it. The arming and
emancipation of the slaves, therefore, is, he
contends, an abandonment of the contest. In other words although Mr. HUNTER did
not put it in that form we seceded to save slavery, and now we abolish slavery
to save secession.
The argument of his speech upon
the grounds of the rebellion is indeed unanswerable, but the tone of it is
humiliating for any intelligent human being. To vote for the bill, he says, is
to abandon the principle of the contest, and to make the losses of the war mere
murders. It is natural to suppose, therefore, that Mr. HUNTER will save his
consistency and honor by resigning. Certainly the " honor" of a Virginian "
gentleman" will not suffer him to be made the tool of traitors to a cause which
he professes to regard as sacred. If the holy cause is to be abandoned, he will
say, find some one else to do it. Not at all. This Virginian "gentleman" is "
instructed" to betray his country, as he conceives, and he makes a wry face and
This is the kind of person who,
for thirty years past, has been lecturing this country upon "honor." This is a
specimen of the "gentlemen" bred in the school of JOHN C. CALHOUN.
The Richmond Enquirer, commenting
upon the debate, says that slavery is dead in Virginia, but that Virginia did
not arm to save slavery, but for the great principle of self government. Where,
when, and how had that principle been assailed ? The election of 1860 was
exactly as constitutional, nor do the rebels deny it, as that of 1856. If the
latter were in obedience to the principle of self government, so was the former.
Either the principle has never prevailed in our system, or it has never been
contravened. If it has never prevailed, why have its hot advocates postponed
their defense of it so long? If it has never been endangered, why do they fight
to protect it?
Or will it be urged that by self
government the Enquirer means State sovereignty? That will not help it. For two
days before the same journal declared that State sovereignty had been the
weakness of the cause, and was as defective in practice as it was pretty in
We expose these contradictions
and absurdities that the utter hollowness of every pretense of this rebellion
may be understood. The London Saturday Review, which as been from the first as
unscrupulous as the Richmond papers, and much more cunning than the London Times
in pleading the cause of the rebels, now declares, in their dire extremity :
" The promoters of Secession were
as blind as the last of the Stuarts ; but the parallel holds no farther. Instead
of tamely recoiling in the face of unexpected resistance, they have, to the
utmost of their material power, made good by their valor and fortitude the
miscalculations of their policy ; and they have substituted for the fanciful or
trivial grievances which formed the original pretext of their quarrel a
practical assertion of the right of a great and heroic community to form an
That is to say, the Saturday
Review holds that any body of citizens may rise in bloody insurrection against
their government without any reason whatever ; and that is the inevitable logic
of any serious defense of this rebellion. American statesmen and the best
English have always held that, after long and hopeless oppression, when all
legal redress has failed and obviously must continue to fail, then, after due
deliberation and a solemn declaration before God and man of the terrible
necessity forced upon them, an oppressed people may vindicate by arms the
acknowledged rights which laws neither defend nor promise to defend. This is the
right of revolution according to the gravest and best of men.
On the other hand, that a body of
citizens may, upon " fanciful and trivial grievances," plunge a whole nation
into the horrors and sorrow of civil war for the sake of preserving the system
of human slavery, is, according to the London Saturday Review, "a practical
assertion of the right of a great and heroic community to form an independent
To such wretched folly are those
reduced who undertake gravely to defend the most causeless and infamous
rebellion in history.
THE mystery of SHERMAN'S march
was imposing. Yet the silence of the rebels was most expressive. If they made
eager haste to publish such stories as that of BRAGG'S victory and of WADE
HAMPTON'S victory, did they not see that not to claim SHERMAN'S defeat was to
concede his success? The winks and shrugs and hints of the Richmond journals
were simply the grimaces of despair. " She knew that I knew that she knew," says
the good lady in Cranford, and we know that the rebels know that we know that
SHERMAN'S march is as yet unimpeded.
" It is the flying of a bird
through the air;" "it is a huge raid ;" " the country closes up behind him ;"
"he is marching to his doom:" these and other things like them were all the
rebel journals had to say. Did they really suppose that bluster in Richmond
would stop SHERMAN in Carolina ? Did they imagine that railing and roaring, or
sneering and snuffling were valuable allies against such a man ? " He has yet to
prove himself a soldier," they cried. Would they not have consulted their own
honor by admitting that a man who could march from Chattanooga to Richmond by
the way of Atlanta, Savannah, and South and North Carolina, shaking the "
Confederacy" at every step, might have some military talent?
War is uncertain. We constantly
remember it and remind our readers of it. But if SHERMAN joins
GRANT, will it be conceded that he has done any
thing? If Richmond is evacuated and Davis flies, will SHERMAN'S march still be a
huge raid ? If this campaign shall end the substantial military effort of the
rebellion, will GRANT still be only a butcher, and will SHERMAN yet have to
prove himself a soldier?
When a rebellion is reduced to
frantic rhetoric it will soon spend its last breath.
DEATH ON THE RAIL.
THE universal railway slaughter
which is now taking place in this country gives occasion for a striking
illustration of the pusillanimity of the American people. There is no other
country in the world where such frightful daily massacres would be tolerated.
But we content ourselves with a joke and a shrug, and a coroner's jury which "
fully exonerates the employes on the train from all blame."
This is the verdict upon the
recent wanton and awful disaster on the Camden and Amboy road. What are the
facts ? A train stops upon a curve. Another train comes thundering on and
crashes into it with horrible destruction of life and limb. Mr. WILLIAM EARLEY,
Coroner, and six gentlemen of the neighborhood, there upon inform us that the
accident resulted from a want of proper caution on the part of the switch tender
at Neshaminy Bridge in not stopping the Washington train according to the orders
given him by the conductor of the twelve o'clock P.M. train from Philadelphia,
believing, according to the evidence given, that there was a misunderstanding on
the part of said switch man as to those orders, which, in their opinion, tend to
mitigate the censure which otherwise would fall upon said switch tender ; and
the jury fully exonerate the employes on the train from all blame.
If the switch tender
misunderstood simple orders the Company is directly responsible for the.
consequences of his stupidity. But if the conductor gave them blunderingly he is
the guilty agent. It is idle to talk of misunderstanding. There was no
opportunity for misunderstanding. The thing to be done was to stop the other
train or to switch it off; and as the conductor is by position the higher
officer, the conductor of the 12 P.M. train from Philadelphia must be held
responsible for not stopping the Washington train, and for the frightful results
of not stopping it.
And so thoroughly subjected are
the people of New Jersey by the great Camden and Amboy monopoly that they must
not be surprised if such a verdict is generally regarded as an attempt to shield
that monopoly from public indignation. Every citizen of New Jersey, in a matter
which concerns the Camden and Amboy Railroad, is liable to suspicion until the
State emancipated itself from its control. How many influential newspapers in
New Jersey dare to expose the acts of that monopoly ? How many leading lawyers
accept briefs against it ? How many men in public life hope to rise in face of
its enmity? We know nothing of Mr. WILLIAM EARLEY, Coroner, nor do we insinuate
a suspicion of his perfect rectitude ; but as he is a Jerseyman, living in the
vicinity of the Camden and Amboy Railroad, and heads such a dainty verdict, it
is impossible to help wondering whether the worthy Mr. EARLEY has, or has had,
or hopes to have, any advantageous relations with that Company.
We speak of the Camden and Amboy
accident, but the air hums with disaster upon every side. Remedies are easy if
Legislatures were honest. In the State of New York, for instance, the
Legislature should make every train come to a full stop at every draw bridge. It
should compel the renewal of the rails at certain periods. They should have the
roads constantly inspected by experts paid by the State. It should enforce a
heavy fine from every Company for every accident which could not be
satisfactorily proved beyond human control. By thus squeezing the pocket of
every Company in the State, the Legislature would keep every railroad in good
repair and save hundreds of lives.
But unless the people move by
petition and besiege the Legislatures nothing will be done. Men and women will
be slaughtered by scores, and after the indignation of the newspapers has
expressed itself, we shall be comforted by the polite verdict that nobody was to
blame, with a mild implication of censure upon the foolish brittleness of the
ON the 12th of last September
General SHERMAN wrote to the Mayor of
Atlanta : " War is cruelty and you can not
refine it, and those who brought war on our country deserve all the curses and
maledictions a people can pour out
Once admit the Union, once more
acknowledge the authority of the national Government, and instead of devoting
your houses and streets and roads to the dread uses of war, I and this army
become at once your protectors and supporters, shielding you from danger let it
come from what quarter it may You might as well appeal against the thunder
storm as against these terrible hardships of war."
Yet WADE HAMPTON, one of the
chief actors in this bloody contest which he and his fellows forced upon their
country, is frantic with rage because General SHERMAN, in the absence of civil
authorities, forages upon the country and orders those who murder his foragers
to be shot. WADE HAMPTON does not deny this military right of forage, but he
says " there is a right older even than this, and one more inalienable, the
right that every man has to defend his home and to protect those that are
dependent upon him."
Look at it ! WADE HAMPTON and his
associates offer this nation an alternative. It must submit peaceably to
destruction, or it must fight for its life. The nation chooses the latter.
HAMPTON and Company light their matches and fire. They invite civil war. They
begin civil war. And when civil war clutches them by the throat they cry "
thief," " murderer," " barbarian," " savage," and " wild beast." To all this
which flows freely from the pen of "Yours, etc., WADE HAMPTON,
Lieutenant-General," the letter of General SHERMAN contains the calm and
complete reply. "Personally I regret the bitter feelings engendered by this war;
but they were to be expected, and I simply allege that those who struck the
first blow, and made war inevitable, ought not in fairness to reproach us for
the natural consequences."
"BOOT, saddle, to horse, and
away!" So shouts PHILIP SHERIDAN cheerily as he swings into the saddle and rides
forward with his bold and merry men. Presently his voice rings back again from
far away: "I have had no opposition. Every body is bewildered by our movements.
I have had no news of any kind since I left." And again: "I can not speak in too
high terms of Generals
CUSTER, and DEVEN, and the officers and men of
their commands. They have waded through mud and water during this continuous
rain, and are all in fine spirits and health."
This also will probably be
treated as " a mere raid" by the Richmond doctors. But if a mere raid can cut "
the great feeder" of the rebel capital, and if the engagements of General LEE in
North Carolina prevent his attending to repairing the feeder, may not a mere
raid be of rather vital importance ? Hamlet was scratched only; but Hamlet died
of it. The campaign which General GRANT opened upon the first of last May is
proceeding. " I shall fight it out upon this line," he said, and he is keeping
COWELL LENDING A HAND.
WE are afraid that even COWELL
can not save the rebellion. COWELL is a correspondent of the London Examiner.
COWELL hears something of a proposition reported to have been made at Hampton
Roads to unite the national and rebel forces in an invasion of Canada and
Mexico; and Cowmen hastens to remind the Examiner that this was Mr. SEWARD'S
original plan of avoiding the war ! Ah ! thinks COWELL, assisted by the London
Times, if it could only be believed that the American Secretary of State is the
author of this suggestion, somebody might be induced to throw an alms in the hat
of a needy rebellion !
But, as we said, even COWELL will
hardly succeed. The United States, France, and England are certainly not cordial
friends, but they do not wish to go to war with each other. That we have been
bitterly hostile to England for her hot haste in recognizing the rebels as
belligerents, and maritime belligerents, is true. That we may call upon her for
indemnity for the losses wrought by the rebel ships that sailed from her ports
under her flag is very possible. But if we do, she will leave the question to
arbitration she will not go to war about it.
That France has failed in respect
for the Monroe doctrine, as generally understood, is apparent. That she chose
the season of our distraction to accomplish her purpose is beyond question. But
that the United States, emerging sad and weary from a wasting civil war, with a
vast country to compose and a debt of three or four thousand millions of dollars
to pay, would wish more drafts and more debts in order to restore Mexico to its
traditional anarchy is not clear. Or that Louis NAPOLEON, to keep his balance in
Mexico, would try to destroy that of the United States, just as it was righting
itself, and thus invoke general war in Christendom, is less likely than that he
will see such a course to be unnecessary. The United States, (Next